David Kiogora Kirimania v Miringu Muchai Ikabu & another [2017] KEELC 200 (KLR)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 200
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 200 (KLR)
- Decided
- 17 October 2017
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from an order of the Environment and Land Court at MeruCoramHon. L.N. MBUGUA
Holding
The court allows the replying affidavit to be part of the record due to the non-inordinate delay in filing.
Facts
The plaintiff, David Kiogora Kirimania, filed a case against the defendants, Miringu Muchai Ikabu and Peter Maina, regarding a response to a court order. The defendants failed to file their response within the given time frame.
Issues
- Defendants' failure to file response within the stipulated time
- Court's jurisdiction to retain inherent powers to make necessary orders
Reasoning
The court found that the defendants were late with just one day and retained the inherent jurisdiction to make necessary orders.
Outcome
The replying affidavit is allowed to be part of the record.
Orders
- Allowing the replying affidavit to be part of the record
Authorities cited
Cases cited (1)
- Interactive Ganning and Lotteries Limited VS Flint East Africa and 2 Others NBI HCC 115 OF 2011
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…