SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Onesmas Nthanga Nguma & 77 others v Katelembo Athiani Muputi Farming and Ranching Co-operative Society & 6 others [2017] KEELC 2411 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 2411 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2411
Citation
[2017] KEELC 2411 (KLR)
Decided
16 June 2017
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand DisputePosturePetition for Temporary InjunctionCoramO.A. ANGOTE
The court allows the Petitioners' application for a temporary injunction and maintains the status quo.

Facts

Petitioners claim ancestral land rights and are in occupation of the disputed land. 1st Respondent claims to have purchased the land from a white settler, but the Petitioners argue they have been in occupation for generations.

Issues

  • Jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court
  • Ownership of the disputed land

Reasoning

The court rules that the Environment and Land Court has exclusive jurisdiction over land disputes, and the Petitioners' occupation of the land is not trespassing.

Outcome

Petition granted

Orders

  • Temporary injunction restraining 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 5th Respondents from summoning, arresting, detaining, prosecuting, evicting or harassing the Petitioners over their occupation and use of the land pending the main Petition.
  • Costs of the Application are in the cause.

Remedies

  • Temporary injunction

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Constitution of Kenya
  • Registered Lands Act (Repealed)
  • Land Registration Act
  • Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013)
Cases cited (1)
  • Republic vs Karisa Chengo & others, Supreme Court. Petition No. 5 of 2015
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case