Joshua Nzive Mulwa & 3 others v Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd & another [2017] KEELC 2428 (KLR)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 2428
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 2428 (KLR)
- Decided
- 13 July 2017
The consent order should be set aside as the 2nd Defendant had the legal capacity to sell the land to Westlink Developers Limited before the consent order was entered.
Facts
The Plaintiffs applied for the setting aside of a consent order entered into on January 21, 2008, which allowed them to vacate the suit property on April 30, 2008, and settle the suit upon payment of agreed amount. The Plaintiffs claimed the 2nd Defendant had no capacity to sell the land, but later discovered the 2nd Defendant had the capacity to sell the land to Westlink Developers Limited before the consent order.
Issues
- Whether the consent order should be set aside due to the 2nd Defendant's alleged lack of capacity to sell the land.
- Whether the Plaintiffs' vacating the suit property on April 30, 2008, and settling the suit upon payment of agreed amount is enforceable.
Reasoning
The Plaintiffs' claim that the 2nd Defendant had no capacity to sell the land is not supported by the evidence. The land had already been transferred to Westlink Developers Limited by a grant dated December 7, 2007.
Outcome
The consent order is set aside.
Orders
- The consent order is set aside.
- The Plaintiffs are not required to vacate the suit property on April 30, 2008.
Remedies
- The consent order is set aside.
- The Plaintiffs are not required to vacate the suit property on April 30, 2008.
Loading judgment…