SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ebby Minayo Mungasia v Shadrack Macharia Mwangi & another [2017] KEELC 2510 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 2510 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2510
Citation
[2017] KEELC 2510 (KLR)
Decided
14 June 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a judgment dismissing the plaintiff's suit and allowing the defendant's counterclaimCoramNot explicitly named in the text, but implied to be the presiding judge(s)
Holding

The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit and allowed the defendant's counterclaim.

Facts

The plaintiff sued the defendant for eviction, permanent injunction, and other remedies over a land parcel known as UASIN GISHU/LELMOKL/15. The defendant claimed the land belonged to the estate of the late Mary Njeri Mwangi, who died in 1989.

Issues

  1. Defendant's claim that the land belongs to the estate of the deceased Mary Njeri Mwangi
  2. Plaintiff's counterclaim for eviction, injunction, and damages

Reasoning

The court ruled that the land belonged to the estate of the deceased Mary Njeri Mwangi and that the plaintiff's registration was fraudulent.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • A declaration that the plaintiff's registration as the proprietor of the land parcel is nullity and unlawful
  • A declaration that the plaintiff's title to the land parcel has been extinguished
  • Costs of the suit and counter-claim

Remedies

  • A declaration that the plaintiff's registration is nullity and unlawful
  • A declaration that the plaintiff's title to the land parcel has been extinguished

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Law of Succession Act
  • Limitation of Actions Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case