SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kiprono Arap Koske v John Cheruiyot Koskei [2017] KEELC 2691 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 2691 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2691
Citation
[2017] KEELC 2691 (KLR)
Decided
16 June 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a judgment granting sub-division of landCoramJ. M. ONYANGO
Holding

The Defendant's application is allowed, and the judgment is set aside. The parties are directed to comply with Order 11 within 30 days to dispose of the case expeditiously.

Facts

The Plaintiff filed a suit seeking sub-division of land parcel number KERICHO/SILIBWET/944 into two equal shares. The Defendant failed to attend the hearing and the Plaintiff obtained a judgment in his favor. The Defendant subsequently applied for a stay of execution and set aside the judgment.

Issues

  1. Whether the Defendant's failure to attend the hearing was excusable
  2. Whether the judgment should be set aside due to the Defendant's defense raising triable issues

Reasoning

The court found the Defendant's wife was critically ill at the time of the hearing, making it excusable for him not to attend. The court also found the Defendant's defense raised triable issues.

Outcome

The judgment is set aside and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

Orders

  • Set aside the judgment
  • Direct parties to comply with Order 11 within 30 days

Remedies

  • Remand for further proceedings

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Yamko Yadpaz Industries Ltd v Kalka Flowers (2013) KLR
  • Shah v Mbogo (1967) EA 116
  • Mbogo v Shah (1967) EA 93
  • Kanji Naran v Velji Ramji (1954) 21 EACA 20
  • Smith v Middleton (1972) SC 30
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case