SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Yusuf Mohammed Ali Jiwa t/a Ajiwa Properties & another v Florence Wangari Mwangi & 2 others [2017] KEELC 2832 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 2832 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2832
Citation
[2017] KEELC 2832 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a decision of the Business Premises Rent TribunalCoramPresiding Judge
Holding

The tenancy did not come to effect due to the defendants' failure to fulfill all the conditions within the time set.

Facts

The plaintiffs offered to lease the defendants the premises measuring 600 square feet on the ground floor of Yunis building for a period of 5 years and 6 months from 1/12/2016 to 31/5/2022. The defendants were to pay a deposit of Kshs.270,000.00 and the first quarter rent of Kshs.270,000.00, and deposit legal fees of Kshs.45,132.00. The defendants issued a bankers cheque of Kshs.270,000.00 which was returned for lack of sufficient funds. The defendants were informed that the offer had lapsed by a letter dated 25/11/2016.

Issues

  1. Whether the intended lease between the plaintiffs and the defendants gave rise to a landlord/tenant relationship.
  2. Whether the tenancy herein is a controlled tenancy hence falling within the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels And Catering Establishments) Act Cap 301.

Reasoning

The defendants did not replace the cheque for Kshs.270,000.00, which was returned for lack of sufficient funds. The defendants were informed that the offer had lapsed by a letter dated 25/11/2016, and the tenancy did not come to effect.

Outcome

The application was dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application was dismissed with costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act Cap 301
  • Civil Procedure Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case