SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Land Disputes Tribunal – Kisumu & another & 2 others Ex Parte Fanuel Okoth Onyango [2017] KEELC 2999 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 2999 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2999
Citation
[2017] KEELC 2999 (KLR)
Decided
24 March 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication for Leave to Apply for an Order of CertiorariCoramJ. M. MUTUNGI
Holding

The court grants the ex parte applicant's Notice of Motion for an order of certiorari to quash the decision of the Nyanza Land Disputes Appeals Committee and the decision of Oyugis Principal Magistrate's Court.

Facts

The applicant, Fanuel Okoth Onyango, sought leave to apply for an order of certiorari to quash the decision of Nyanza Land Disputes Appeals Committee and the decision of Oyugis Principal Magistrate's Court. The applicant claimed that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction and acted ultra vires in making the impugned orders.

Issues

  1. Tribunal's jurisdiction
  2. Decision of the Tribunal and its validity

Reasoning

The court held that the Tribunal acted ultra vires in entertaining a dispute relating to title to land and that its decision was null and void. The court also held that the principal magistrate's court could not validate and give effect to a decision of the provincial appeals committee.

Outcome

Granted

Orders

  • An order of certiorari to bring into this court the decision of the Nyanza Land Disputes Appeals Committee No. 45 of 2009 and Oyugis Principal Magistrate's Court Misc. No. 7 of 2009 decision adopting the said decision as judgment of the court on 24th January 2012 for the purposes of being quashed

Remedies

  • Each party to bear their own costs of the application
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case