SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lawrence Ogaro Onyiego & another v Samwel Minika & another [2017] KEELC 3576 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3576 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3576
Citation
[2017] KEELC 3576 (KLR)
Decided
24 February 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeInjunction ApplicationPostureAppeal from original trialCoramJ. M. MUTUNGI
Holding

The court declines to grant the order of injunction sought in the plaintiffs' application dated 12th November 2015 and dismisses both the plaintiffs' application and the 1st defendant's application.

Facts

The plaintiffs claim that the defendants have entered onto the suit land and are forcefully using tractors to construct a road of access through the suit premises when there is no such a road. The plaintiffs assert that the defendants have damaged a gate leading to the suit premises and have destroyed crops that have been cultivated thereon and there is threat that they will demolish the plaintiffs’ permanent house unless they are restrained.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiffs have established a prima facie case with a probability of success for an injunction.
  2. Whether the plaintiffs would suffer irreparable harm or damage if the injunction is not granted.

Reasoning

The court finds that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated a prima facie case with a probability of success and that the plaintiffs would not suffer irreparable harm or damage if the injunction is not granted.

Outcome

Both the plaintiffs' application and the 1st defendant's application are dismissed.

Orders

  • The plaintiffs' application for injunction is dismissed.
  • The 1st defendant's application to strike out the plaintiffs' suit is dismissed.

Remedies

  • No orders for costs and each party will bear their own costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Government Proceedings Act Cap 40 Laws of Kenya
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Giella –vs- Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd [1973] E.A 358
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case