SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Maria Rosita Cardozo (Suing through here appointed Agent Masai Mara Sopa Lodge Limited v Robert Kibagendi Otachi & another [2017] KEELC 3804 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3804 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3804
Citation
[2017] KEELC 3804 (KLR)
Decided
31 August 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand Registration DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramL. GACHERU
Holding

The Court finds that the transfer of the property was null and void, and the Plaintiff is entitled to the property. The Court orders the rectification of the land registry records and the return of the property to the Plaintiff.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Maria Rosita Cardozo, claimed that the Defendant, Robert Kibagendi Otachi, fraudulently transferred the property Nairobi/Block 90/235 to himself without her knowledge, consent, and/or authority. The Plaintiff sought a declaration that the transfer was null and void, and orders for the return of the property to her.

Issues

  1. Validity of the transfer of the property
  2. Rectification of the land registry records
  3. Ownership of the property

Reasoning

The Court ruled that the transfer was fraudulent and that the Plaintiff's title was valid. The Court also found that the Plaintiff's certificate of title was the valid one.

Outcome

Plaintiff wins

Orders

  • Cancellation of the 1st Defendant's Certificate of title
  • Rectification of the land registry records
  • Return of the property to the Plaintiff

Remedies

  • Return of the property to the Plaintiff
  • Rectification of the land registry records

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Cap 300 (now repealed)
  • Land Registration Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case