SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nancy Wanjiku Mwaura v George Njoroge & 3 others [2017] KEELC 3820 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3820 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3820
Citation
[2017] KEELC 3820 (KLR)
Decided
12 October 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramL. GACHERU
Holding

The Plaintiff's claim is dismissed with costs to the Defendants. The 4th Defendant is entitled to a refund of Kshs.70,000/= from the 1st Defendant.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Nancy Wanjiru Mwaura, sought a declaration that the 1st Defendant, George Njoroge, was a trustee holding the suit property on trust for her and other beneficiaries. She also sought an order directing the 3rd Defendant, Registrar of Titles Kiambu, to cancel the transfer and an injunction against the Defendants from dealing with the property.

Issues

  1. Whether the 1st Defendant is a trustee holding the suit property on trust for the Plaintiff and other beneficiaries.
  2. Validity of the 1st Defendant's sale of the suit property to the 2nd Defendant.
  3. Whether the 4th Defendant is entitled to specific performance of the sale agreement.

Reasoning

The Court finds that the Plaintiff has not proved her case on a balance of probabilities and that the 4th Defendant has not proven his counter-claim. The sale agreement is not valid due to lack of consent from the Land Control Board.

Outcome

Dismissal of the Plaintiff's claim with costs and a refund to the 4th Defendant.

Orders

  • Costs to the Defendants.
  • The 4th Defendant is entitled to a refund of Kshs.70,000/= from the 1st Defendant.

Remedies

  • None
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case