SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Abraham Kibet Chepkonga t/a A. K. Chepkonga & Company Advocates v Paul Gicheru t/a Gicheru & Company Advocates [2017] KEELC 396 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 396 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
396
Citation
[2017] KEELC 396 (KLR)
Decided
24 November 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeProfessional Undertaking DisputePostureAppeal from a decision on a professional undertakingCoramA. OMBWAYO
Holding

The court finds that the defendant must honor the professional undertaking issued on 18th. November, 2014, and orders the defendant to pay the plaintiff Kshs.3,325,000 or deliver the original title deed for the land parcel No. Eldoret Municipality/BLOCK 13/543.

Facts

The plaintiff, Abraham Kibet Chepkonga, claimed that the defendant, Paul Gicheru, issued a professional undertaking to pay Kshs. 3,325,000 to the plaintiff. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant did not deliver the original title deed of the land parcel known as Eldoret Municipality/Block 14/731 as per the undertaking. The defendant denied issuing the undertaking and claimed that it was issued for the benefit of Evan Kiprop Tum and Mike Kipyego Kipkorir.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff was issued with a professional undertaking by the defendant's firm binding itself to pay Kshs. 3,325,000 to the Plaintiff?
  2. Whether the Plaintiff pursuant to the undertaking did deliver to the defendant the original title of the land parcel known as Eldoret Municipality/BLOCK 14/731?
  3. Whether the defendant has complied with the terms of the professional undertaking?
  4. Whether if the defendant having not complied with the terms of the professional undertaking he should be compelled to honor the same by paying Kshs 3,325,000 together with interests to the plaintiff?
  5. Whether the plaintiff in the alternative the defendants should deliver the original title in respect of the land parcel known as Eldoret Municipality/BLOCK 14/731 to the plaintiff?

Reasoning

The court determined that the dispute revolves around the title to the property Eldoret Municipality/Block 14/73. The court found jurisdiction based on the Environment and Land Court Act, which allows the court to hear disputes relating to land and title. The court also found that the defendant must honor the professional undertaking as the plaintiff established on a balance of probabilities that the defendant had a duty to do so.

Outcome

The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff Kshs.3,325,000 or deliver the original title deed for the land parcel No. Eldoret Municipality/BLOCK 13/543.

Orders

  • The defendant to pay the plaintiff Kshs.3,325,000 or deliver the original title deed for the land parcel No. Eldoret Municipality/BLOCK 13/543.

Remedies

  • Payment of Kshs.3,325,000 to the plaintiff or delivery of the original title deed for the land parcel No. Eldoret Municipality/BLOCK 13/543.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Environment and Land Court Act No. 19 of 2011
  • Article 162 (2) (b) of the Constitution of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case