SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nyambura N. Kariuki v Joseph Njakai Kariuki [2018] KEELC 1195 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 1195 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1195
Citation
[2018] KEELC 1195 (KLR)
Decided
19 October 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeInjunction ApplicationPostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramPresiding Judge
Holding

The court granted the Plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction to prevent the Defendant from interfering with the Plaintiff's use of the property until the suit is determined.

Facts

The Plaintiff and Defendant are joint owners of land reference Ruiru East Block 1/Githunguri/1387. The Plaintiff resides in the property and considers it her matrimonial home. The Defendant has threatened to dispose of the property to third parties without the Plaintiff's consent.

Issues

  1. Whether a temporary injunction should be granted to prevent the Defendant from alienating, wasting, damaging, selling, or interfering with the property.
  2. Whether an injunction should be granted to prohibit the Defendant from interfering with the Plaintiff's quiet use of the property until the suit is determined.

Reasoning

The court found that the Plaintiff is a joint owner and the Defendant has threatened to dispose of the property without her consent, thus the Plaintiff's rights are being infringed.

Outcome

Granted

Orders

  • Temporary injunction to prevent Defendant from interfering with Plaintiff's use of the property until the suit is determined.
  • Costs of the application to be provided for.

Remedies

  • Temporary injunction
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case