SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

SG Mbaabu & Co Advocates v Kakenyi & 2 others (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 34 of 2017) [2018] KEELC 1356 (KLR) (12 October 2018) (Ruling)

[2018] KEELC 1356 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1356
Citation
[2018] KEELC 1356 (KLR)
Decided
12 October 2018
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication to set aside decision of Deputy Registrar and to tax costsCoramOA ANGOTE
The Court upholds the decision of the taxing officer and dismisses the Chamber Summons with no order as to costs.

Facts

The Applicant sought to set aside the Deputy Registrar's decision and the certificate of taxation in a previous case. The Applicant valued the land at Kshs. 1,335,000,000, while the Respondents valued it at Kshs. 650,220,000. The Applicant's advocate sought to tax the costs based on the value of the property, but the Respondents argued that the value was not ascertainable from the pleadings.

Issues

  • Whether the Deputy Registrar erred by not relying on the valuation reports when taxing the instruction fees.
  • Whether the taxing officer was entitled to reject the valuation reports during taxation.

Reasoning

The Court held that the value of the property was not ascertainable from the pleadings or judgment, and that the taxing officer was entitled to reject the valuation reports during taxation.

Outcome

Application dismissed with no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Chamber Summons dated 3rd April, 2017 dismissed with no order as to costs.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Joreth Limited vs. Kigano & Associates (2002) eKLR
  • Safaris Unlimited (Africa) Limited vs. Muchanga Investments Limited (2017) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case