SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Attorney General & others Ex-Parte Gitonga Wambugu Kariuki [2018] KEELC 1479 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 1479 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1479
Citation
[2018] KEELC 1479 (KLR)
Decided
3 October 2018
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

The Notice of Motion dated 12th August, 2013 should not be struck out.

Facts

The ex parte applicant filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 27th September, 2013, challenging the Notice of Motion dated 12th August, 2013, filed by the Interested Parties. The ex parte applicant claims the Notice of Motion is flawed due to lack of privity of contract and locus standi.

Issues

  • Whether the Notice of Motion dated 12th August, 2013 should be struck out.
  • Whether the Interested Parties have privity of contract and locus standi to institute a claim at the Land Disputes Tribunal.

Reasoning

The Court held that the Interested Parties are merely seeking to be heard, which is their Constitutional right. The ex parte applicant's claim that the Notice of Motion is flawed due to lack of privity of contract and locus standi is not sufficient to strike out the Notice of Motion.

Outcome

The Notice of Motion dated 12th August, 2013 should not be struck out.

⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case