SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Tima Maulana v Saib Fuad Rudeny [2018] KEELC 1729 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 1729 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1729
Citation
[2018] KEELC 1729 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a lower court decisionCoramJ.O. OLOLA
The Plaintiff is allowed access to her land pending the hearing and determination of the suit

Facts

The Plaintiff purchased two portions of land from John Charo Shutu in 2003, and has been using an access road to her property. The Defendant, who bought his land in 2013, built a perimeter wall that blocked the access road.

Issues

  • Whether the Plaintiff has a right to use the access road
  • Whether the Defendant's actions constitute a breach of the Plaintiff's rights

Reasoning

The Court found that the Plaintiff has been using the access road for 11 years and that the Defendant's actions blocked her access. The Court dismissed the Defendant's application and allowed the Plaintiff's application.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Defendant's application dismissed
  • Plaintiff's application allowed
  • Costs to be in the cause

Remedies

  • Plaintiff's access to her land pending the hearing and determination of the suit
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case