Rurigi Enterprises Limited v A. Bauman & Company Limited [2018] KEELC 2138 (KLR)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 2138
- Citation
- [2018] KEELC 2138 (KLR)
- Decided
- 26 July 2018
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand Transaction DisputePostureAppeal from an order of the High CourtCoramK. BOR
Holding
The court finds it just and meet for the Registrar of the court to execute the lease on the part of the Defendant.
Facts
The Plaintiff entered into a sale agreement with the Defendant in 1998 for the Suit Property. The Plaintiff claims to have paid the full purchase price but has been unable to execute the lease and transfer the property due to the Defendant's failure to extend the lease.
Issues
- Whether the Plaintiff has paid the full purchase price
- Whether the Defendant has extended the lease and transferred the property
Reasoning
The court finds that the Plaintiff has not provided evidence from the Registrar of Companies confirming the Defendant's deregistration, and thus the lease cannot be executed.
Outcome
The court directs the Registrar of the court to execute the lease on the part of the Defendant.
Orders
- Registrar of the court to execute the lease on the part of the Defendant
Remedies
- Registrar of the court to execute the lease on the part of the Defendant
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…