SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Onkware Omwenga v Konoi Sapai [2018] KEELC 2432 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 2432 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2432
Citation
[2018] KEELC 2432 (KLR)
Decided
13 July 2018
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeCivilPostureAppeal from an order granting an ex parte temporary injunctionCoramMOHAMMED NOOR KULLOW
The court dismissed the application and upheld the ex parte order.

Facts

The 2nd Defendant/Applicant sought an order staying the implementation and enforcement of an ex parte temporary injunction against the 2nd Defendant from trespassing or alienating land parcel No. Trans Mara/Meguara/132, and to discharge the ex parte order granted on 14th November, 2017.

Issues

  • Whether the 2nd Defendant is the lawful and registered owner of the land parcel No. Trans Mara/Meguara/132.
  • Whether the ex parte order was granted without the 2nd Defendant being heard.
  • Whether the 1st and 3rd Defendants should be joined as parties in the case.

Reasoning

The court found that the 2nd Defendant is the lawful and registered owner of the land parcel and that the ex parte order was valid.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The ex parte order granting the temporary injunction against the 2nd Defendant is upheld.
  • The 1st and 3rd Defendants are not joined as parties in the case.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Land Registration Act
  • Constitution of Kenya
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case