SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Richard Kausya Nzimbi v Peter Ndeleva Nzimbi & another [2018] KEELC 3038 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3038 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3038
Citation
[2018] KEELC 3038 (KLR)
Decided
14 May 2018
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand DisputePostureDefendants failed to enter appearance and file defenceCoramMBOGO C.G JUDGE
The court finds in favor of the plaintiff, ordering him to be evicted from the defendants' encroached portion of the land and awarding him Kshs. 150,000 in general damages.

Facts

The plaintiff, Richard Kausya Nzimbi, claims his land parcel UKIA/UTAATI/1179 was wrongly subdivided and that the defendants, Peter Ndeleva Nzimbi and Waita Ndeleva, have encroached on his land. The plaintiff registered a complaint with the Surveyor and the Land Registrar, who marked the boundaries, but the defendants obstructed the surveyor's work.

Issues

  • Ownership of land parcel UKIA/UTAATI/1179
  • Encroachment by defendants

Reasoning

The court confirms the plaintiff's claim to the land and orders eviction due to encroachment, awarding general damages for trespass.

Outcome

In favor of the plaintiff

Orders

  • Orders of permanent and mandatory injunction against the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's land
  • Order for eviction of defendants from the plaintiff's land
  • Order for the officer commanding Makindu Division to enforce the court's orders

Remedies

  • Eviction of defendants from the plaintiff's land
  • General damages of Kshs. 150,000

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Land Registration Act, 2012
  • Subdivision of Land Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Halsbury's Laws of England, 4th ed, vol 45, para 26, 1503
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case