SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Richard Toroitich v Mike K Lelmet & 3 others [2018] KEELC 3870 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3870 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3870
Citation
[2018] KEELC 3870 (KLR)
Decided
1 February 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand CasePostureApplication for leave to file and serve further documents and witnessesCoramMWANGI NJOROGE
Holding

The application is granted in terms of prayer 1 and 2 thereof. The documents mentioned therein having been served in advance, the defendants are granted leave to respond to such documents as may be appropriate but subject to this court's supervision. The plaintiff shall meet the costs of this application.

Facts

The plaintiff filed a land case against the defendants, seeking to file and serve further documents and witnesses due to mislaid files and ailing witnesses. The plaintiff also cited legal provisions and the overriding objective of the Environment and Land Court Act.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff's application for leave to file and serve further documents and witnesses is competent
  2. Whether the application is an abuse of the court process

Reasoning

The court sympathizes with the defendant's concerns but grants the application due to the plaintiff's disclosure of new documents and witnesses aiding substantive justice.

Outcome

Granted

Orders

  • Leave granted to file and serve further documents and witnesses
  • Leave granted to respond to documents as appropriate

Remedies

  • Costs awarded to the plaintiff

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Environment and Land Court Act (Act No. 19 of 2011)
Cases cited (1)
  • Copper -vs- Smith 1884 26 CHD 700
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case