SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mary Njeri Kiarie & Githunguri Njiru Farm (1966) Ltd v Tafuta Development Company Limited [2018] KEELC 3919 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3919 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3919
Citation
[2018] KEELC 3919 (KLR)
Decided
9 February 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramS. Okongo
Holding

The court finds no valid agreement for sale between the deceased and the defendant's director, and dismisses the defendant's counter-claim. The plaintiffs are ordered to vacate and hand over the suit property to the plaintiffs' administrator within 60 days.

Facts

The plaintiffs, Mary Njeri Kiarie and Githunguri Njiru Farm (1966) Ltd, sought an order for eviction and a permanent injunction against the defendant, Tafuta Development Company Limited, over a parcel of land known as Plot No. 225, registered in the name of the plaintiffs' deceased shareholder.

Issues

  1. Validity of the agreement for sale between the deceased and the defendant's director
  2. Ownership and transfer of the suit property

Reasoning

The court determined that the plaintiffs proved their claim while the defendant's counter-claim was not proven. The court found that the defendant had no proprietary interest in the suit property.

Outcome

Judgment for the plaintiffs

Orders

  • The defendant shall vacate and hand over the suit property to the plaintiffs' administrator within 60 days
  • A permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the suit property

Remedies

  • Eviction of the defendant from the suit property
  • Permanent injunction against the defendant
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case