SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Richard Toroitich v Mike K Lelmet & 3 others [2018] KEELC 3921 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3921 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3921
Citation
[2018] KEELC 3921 (KLR)
Decided
8 February 2018
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand CasePostureOriginal TrialCoramMWANGI NJOROGE
The court admits a copy of the 2003 agreement as evidence in the case.

Facts

The plaintiff, Richard Toroitich, claims that the defendants, Mike K. Lelmet and others, have failed to provide consideration for an agreement dated 2/4/2003. The plaintiff claims that the file containing the original agreement was lost while he was traveling from Mombasa.

Issues

  • Consideration for the 2003 agreement
  • Admissibility of a copy of the agreement

Reasoning

The court finds that the copy of the agreement is a replica of what was filed alongside the plaint on 31/1/2014 and there is no challenge to its existence. The court exercises its discretion to admit the copy as evidence.

Outcome

The court admits a copy of the 2003 agreement as evidence in the case.

⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case