SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sabuna Wanyonyi Isack & 5 others v County Government of Trans-Nzoia [2018] KEELC 4108 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 4108 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
4108
Citation
[2018] KEELC 4108 (KLR)
Decided
28 February 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureApplication for Temporary Injunction - Opposition and Counter-ApplicationCoramMWANGI NJOROGE
Holding

The application has merit, and a temporary injunction is issued restraining the defendant from trespassing upon, evicting the occupants of the subject plots pending the hearing and determination of the suit.

Facts

The plaintiffs claim to be lawful allottees of unsurveyed residential plots in Kitale Municipality, Trans-Nzoia County, and allege that the defendant, County Government of Trans-Nzoia, has trespassed upon, demolished structures on, or evicted the occupants of the plots. The plaintiffs have provided letters of allotment and receipts for property rates payments.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiffs have established a prima facie case for a temporary injunction.
  2. Whether the balance of convenience tilts in favor of the defendant.

Reasoning

The court finds that the plaintiffs have not established a prima facie case with a probability of success, but the balance of convenience tilts in favor of the plaintiffs due to the plaintiffs' claim of lawful allotment and the defendant's failure to file a replying affidavit.

Outcome

Temporary injunction granted

Orders

  • Temporary injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing upon, evicting the occupants of the subject plots

Remedies

  • Costs of the application shall be in the cause
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case