SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Moses Makokha Osanya v Elekia Mabosio Marenga [2018] KEELC 4173 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 4173 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
4173
Citation
[2018] KEELC 4173 (KLR)
Decided
7 March 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a Provincial Appeals Committee decisionCoramOdunga
Holding

The appeal is allowed, the decision of the Appeals Committee is quashed, and the Lurambi Land Disputes Tribunal and Provincial Land Dispute Appeals Committee's decision is set aside with costs to the appellant.

Facts

The appellant appealed against the decision of the Provincial Appeals Committee, alleging that the matter fell outside the jurisdiction of the Land Disputes Tribunal and that the committee erred in law and fact.

Issues

  1. Whether the matter fell within the jurisdiction of the Land Disputes Tribunal
  2. Whether the Appeals Committee erred in allowing the Land Disputes Tribunal's decision
  3. Whether the Appeals Committee erred in relying on the respondent's evidence
  4. Whether the decision of the Appeals Committee was dated wrongly
  5. Whether the Appeals Committee erred in adopting the decision of the Land Disputes Tribunal

Reasoning

The court found that the proceedings and decision fell outside the jurisdiction of the Land Disputes Tribunal and violated the Land Disputes Tribunal Act.

Outcome

Appeal allowed, decision of the Appeals Committee quashed

Orders

  • The decision of the Appeals Committee is quashed with costs to the appellant

Remedies

  • Quashing of the decision of the Appeals Committee

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Disputes Tribunal Act No. 18 of 1990
Cases cited (1)
  • Masagu Ole Naumo v Principal Magistrate Kajiado Law Courts & another, Nairobi, High Court, JR 370 of 2013 [2014] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case