SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Safari Rophus Kaingu & another v Abdalla Mwabudzuma [2018] KEELC 4437 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 4437 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
4437
Citation
[2018] KEELC 4437 (KLR)
Decided
22 February 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeInterlocutory InjunctionPostureApplication for Prohibitory and Interlocutory Mandatory InjunctionCoramC. YANO
Holding

The notice of Motion is dismissed. The Plaintiffs have not established a prima facie case with a probability of success to warrant the Injunction orders sought.

Facts

The Plaintiffs claim to be the legal and beneficial owners of a piece of land in Majaoni Utange, which they inherited from their father. The Defendant, who had no land, was given a portion of the land to settle and paid Kshs.60,000. He later surrendered the land and was refunded Kshs.93,050. The Plaintiffs allege that the Defendant is now encroaching and building structures on the land.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiffs have a prima facie case with a probability of success to warrant the Injunction orders sought.
  2. Whether the Plaintiffs have shown irreparable injury they will suffer in the event the Injunction is not granted.

Reasoning

The Defendant was given possession of the land by the Plaintiffs and entered the land with their permission. The Plaintiffs have not shown irreparable injury they will suffer in the event the Injunction is not granted.

Outcome

The notice of Motion is dismissed.

Orders

  • The Plaintiffs’ application is dismissed.
  • The Plaintiffs and the Defendant are to bear their own costs.

Remedies

  • None

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (2)
  • Giella –v- Cassman Brown & Co Ltd (1973) EA 358
  • Locabail International. Finance Ltd –v- Agro Export & Another (1986)1 AL ER 90
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case