SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Simon Wang’anya Barasa (suing on his behalf and as Leg. Rep of the estate of Jeremiah Mukwana Barasa) v Dennis Mumia Omenda [2018] KEELC 671 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 671 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
671
Citation
[2018] KEELC 671 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand AdjudicationPostureRespondent did not appear, case was handled as an ordinary applicationCorampresiding judge
The Applicant is declared to have acquired ownership and title to the disputed land by adverse possession.

Facts

The Applicant's late father purchased a portion of land measuring 2.0Ha from the Respondent's late father, who was registered owner. The Applicant has lived on the land since 1984 without interruption.

Issues

  • adverse possession
  • title acquisition
  • registration of title

Reasoning

The Applicant's continuous, open, and notorious possession of the land since 1984, without interruption, meets the requirements of adverse possession. The Respondent's father and Respondent discontinued possession in 1984, allowing the Applicant to claim ownership.

Outcome

The Applicant is declared the owner of the disputed land.

Orders

  • Respondent to sign necessary documents for subdivision and transfer of land
  • Respondent to meet costs

Remedies

  • Declaration of ownership
  • Subdivision and transfer of land

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Limitations of Actions Act
  • Land Registration Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case