SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Samson Ole Tina V Director of Land Adjudication & Settlement & 9 others [2018] KEELC 951 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 951 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
951
Citation
[2018] KEELC 951 (KLR)
Decided
26 October 2018
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeBoundary DisputePosturePetition for Order to Order Land Registrar to Visit Land and File ReportCoramMohamed N. Kullow
The court orders the Land Registrar Trans Mara and the Surveyor to visit the two parcels of land, identify the boundaries, confirm if a road separates the parcels, and file a report within 30 days under the direct supervision of the Rift Valley Regional Surveyor.

Facts

The Petitioner claims there is a boundary dispute involving two parcels of land, Plot No. 15 Olalui Adjudication Section and Plot No. 163 Ololchani Adjudication Section. The Respondents oppose the application, stating the Petitioners are on a fishing expedition.

Issues

  • Order the Land Registrar to visit the land and file a report on the exact boundaries
  • Confirm if there is any overlapping and encroachment of the plots
  • Confirm if there exists a road that cuts through the parcels

Reasoning

The court finds the application merited due to the lack of survey maps or title deeds presented by the parties and the need for the Land Registrar to fix boundaries.

Outcome

Order to visit the land and file a report

Orders

  • Land Registrar Trans Mara and Surveyor to visit the two parcels of land
  • Identify the boundaries
  • Confirm if a road separates the parcels
  • File a report within 30 days under the direct supervision of the Rift Valley Regional Surveyor

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Land Registration Act
  • Constitution of Kenya (Supervisory Jurisdiction and Protection of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms of the Individual) High Court Practice and Procedure Rules, 2006
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case