SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Truphena Mena & 5 others v Bonventure A. Omuse [2019] KEELC 1351 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 1351 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1351
Citation
[2019] KEELC 1351 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeContempt of CourtPostureApplication for Contempt of CourtCoramMWANGI NJOROGE
Holding

The respondent is guilty of contempt of court for wilfully defying the court order to stop interfering with the tenancy.

Facts

The applicants occupied the respondent's premises for 5-10 years. The respondent fenced off the premises and informed the applicants they were no longer required. The applicants filed a Business Premises Rent Tribunal case, but the respondent disrupted their businesses. The applicants sought an injunction and punishment for contempt.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicants vacated the premises voluntarily
  2. Whether the respondent defied the court order to stop interfering with the tenancy

Reasoning

The court found that the applicants were still interested in accessing the premises by 11/5/2019 and that the respondent proceeded with nuisances with the intent of constructively evicting them.

Outcome

The respondent is convicted of contempt of court and ordered to appear personally for mitigation and sentencing.

Orders

  • Certify the matter urgent and hear it forthwith
  • Order the respondent to appear in person during the hearing of the application
  • Convict the respondent of contempt of court
  • Order the respondent to appear before the court personally for mitigation and sentencing on 1st October 2019 at 9.00 a.m.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Contempt of Court Act, 2016
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case