SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Electrical Marketing (Wholesale) Ltd v Nairobi City County & 2 others [2019] KEELC 1982 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 1982 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1982
Citation
[2019] KEELC 1982 (KLR)
Decided
15 July 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a ruling and order of Hon. M. W. Njagi, First Class Magistrate at Nairobi City CourtCoramK. BOR
Holding

The court allows the appeal and sets aside the orders made for the sale of L.R. No. 209/8323 by way of public auction on 30/8/2011 and all subsequent orders relating to the Suit Property.

Facts

The Appellant, Electrical Marketing (Wholesale) Ltd, sought a prohibition order to restrain dealings with land reference number 209/8323 (the Suit Property) and the setting aside of the orders made on 30/8/2011 for the sale of the Suit Property by public auction. The Appellant contended that there was no proper service of the proceedings before the sale of the Suit Property and that the Appellant was placed under receivership on 19/6/2006 yet the receiver manager was not involved in the proceedings.

Issues

  1. No proper service on the Appellant
  2. Proceedings taken before judgment were irregular and unprocedural
  3. Sale of the Appellant's parcel of land was undervalued

Reasoning

The court found that the service effected by the process server was proper and provided for under Section 17 (4) (b) of the Rating Act. The court also found that the sale of the Suit Property was not undervalued, but the court was satisfied that there were material irregularities and fraud in the conduct of the sale.

Outcome

The judgement of Hon. M. W. Njagi, First Class Magistrate at Nairobi City Court delivered on 29/5/2017 in Civil Suit Number 3 of 2011 and all consequential orders are hereby set aside.

Orders

  • Set aside the orders made for the sale of L.R. No. 209/8323 by way of public auction on 30/8/2011 and all subsequent orders relating to the Suit Property

Remedies

  • Award the costs of the appeal to be borne by the 1st Respondent

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Rating Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Order 22 of the Civil Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case