Agripina Khati v Richard Livondo Wiranga & another [2019] KEELC 200 (KLR)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 200
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 200 (KLR)
- Decided
- 18 December 2019
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a previous orderCoramN.A. MATHEKA
Holding
The application is dismissed with costs as the appeal is not arguable and the success of the appeal would not be rendered nugatory.
Facts
The appellant/applicant, Agripina Khati, is seeking a stay of the respondents' eviction of her from the suit land, which the respondents have started ploughing. The appellant depends on the land for her daily subsistence.
Issues
- Whether the appeal is arguable
- Whether the applicant has a sufficient cause to justify a stay
Reasoning
The court finds the appeal not arguable and that the applicant has not fulfilled the grounds to justify a stay. The court is not persuaded that the appeal is frivolous and that the success of the appeal would be rendered nugatory.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs
Authorities cited
Cases cited (1)
- Carter & Sons Ltd vs Deposit Protection Fund Board & 2 Others Civil Appeal No. 291 of 1997
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…