SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

John Okumu Odulla v John Owuor Osore [2019] meKLR [2019] KEELC 2199 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 2199 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2199
Citation
[2019] KEELC 2199 (KLR)
Decided
31 July 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a previous order dismissing the suit for non-attendance and want of prosecutionCoramS.M. KIBUN, S.M. KIBUN
Holding

The court allows the Plaintiff's motion to set aside the order of March 20, 2017 and reinstate the suit, but the Plaintiff must pay the Defendant Kshs. 20,000 in throwaway costs within 30 days.

Facts

The Plaintiff filed a suit on February 25, 2011, and the Defendant filed their defence on March 7, 2017, after the court issued a notice to show cause on November 24, 2016. The Plaintiff did not attend the court on March 20, 2017, when the suit was dismissed.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff has reasonable cause to set aside the order of March 20, 2017 and reinstate the suit.
  2. Who pays the costs.

Reasoning

The court finds that the Plaintiff deserves a last chance to prosecute the case, but the Plaintiff must pay the Defendant Kshs. 20,000 in throwaway costs.

Outcome

The Plaintiff's motion is granted, but with a condition that the Plaintiff pays the Defendant Kshs. 20,000 in throwaway costs within 30 days.

Orders

  • The order dismissing the suit for want of prosecution of March 20, 2017 is set aside and the suit is reinstated.
  • The Plaintiff must pay the Defendant Kshs. 20,000 in throwaway costs within 30 days.

Remedies

  • The reinstatement of the suit with a condition that the Plaintiff pays the Defendant Kshs. 20,000 in throwaway costs within 30 days.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case