SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Aricarenda Wathitha v Zipporah Wangechi Muturi & another; Joyce Muthoni Muriuki (Substitute) [2019] KEELC 2386 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 2386 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2386
Citation
[2019] KEELC 2386 (KLR)
Decided
28 June 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureOriginal Trial
Holding

Customary law trust exists between the plaintiff and the 2nd defendant in respect of the suit land. The registration of the 2nd defendant's title to the suit land was not fraudulently obtained.

Facts

The plaintiff, Aricarenda Wathitha, claims customary law trust and seeks to sub-divide and register land parcel NGARIAMA/KABARE/414 in her name. The 2nd defendant, Zipporah Wangechi Muturi, claims absolute ownership and seeks to evict the plaintiff and her family.

Issues

  1. Customary law trust between plaintiff and 2nd defendant
  2. Fraudulent acquisition of 2nd defendant's title
  3. Registration of 2nd defendant's title

Reasoning

The plaintiff's testimony and evidence of cohabitation and possession of the land are sufficient to establish a customary law trust. The defendants' allegations of fraudulent title acquisition are unsubstantiated.

Outcome

The court declared that the land parcel is registered in the names of the 2nd defendant as a trustee for himself and the plaintiff. The court also ordered the 2nd defendant to sub-divide the land into equal portions and register the sub-divisions and transfers in favor of the plaintiff and the 2nd defendant.

Orders

  • Declaration of customary law trust
  • Order to sub-divide and register land

Remedies

  • Declaration of customary law trust
  • Order to sub-divide and register land

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • JUSTUS MAINA MURUKU VS JANE WAITHIRA MWANGI [2018] e KLR
  • MBUI MUKANGU VS GERALD MUTWIRI MBUI C.A. NO.281 OF 2000
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case