SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kirangi Nyamu v Ireri Mbogo & 3 others [2019] KEELC 2692 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 2692 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2692
Citation
[2019] KEELC 2692 (KLR)
Decided
27 June 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAdverse PossessionPostureAppeal from a dismissal of an application for review and setting aside of an eviction orderCoramY.M. ANGIMA
Holding

The court finds no merit in the applicant's notice of motion and dismisses it with costs to the respondent

Facts

The applicant filed an originating summons seeking adverse possession of land, which was dismissed for want of prosecution. The applicant then filed multiple applications, including a notice of motion seeking to set aside the dismissal order, but was ultimately dismissed for lack of prosecution.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's application to set aside the dismissal order was timely and merited
  2. Whether the applicant's conduct in filing multiple applications was diligent and not merely a delaying tactic

Reasoning

The court dismissed the applicant's application for setting aside the dismissal order due to the applicant's lack of diligence in prosecuting his applications and the undue delay in filing the instant application.

Outcome

The applicant's notice of motion dated 16 January 2019 is dismissed with costs to the 3rd respondent assessed at Ksh.20,000/- to be paid within 30 days.

Orders

  • The applicant is ordered to pay the court adjournment fee ordered on 4 April 2018
  • The applicant is ordered to pay Ksh.20,000/- to the 3rd respondent within 30 days

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap. 22)
  • Register of Land Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case