SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Robert Kioko Muthiani (suing as an Administrators of the Estate of Muthiani Musomba) v Mathenge Manoti [2019] KEELC 2952 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 2952 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2952
Citation
[2019] KEELC 2952 (KLR)
Decided
20 June 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand SuitPostureDefendant was served with summons and failed to file a defence, the case proceeded as an undefended suit.CoramMbogo C.G.
The court finds for the Plaintiff and orders an eviction of the Defendant from the subject land, Kshs. 200,000 in general damages, and costs of the suit.

Facts

The Plaintiff is the administrator of the estate of Muthiani Musomba and holds land parcel number Mbitini/Ngetha/390 in trust for other beneficiaries. The Defendant unlawfully trespassed onto the land and erected a chain link.

Issues

  • What are the damages the Plaintiff is entitled to?
  • Whether the Defendant should be evicted from the subject land.

Reasoning

The court finds the Plaintiff is the registered owner of the land and the Defendant trespassed. The court awards nominal damages as the Plaintiff has not suffered actual loss.

Outcome

For the Plaintiff

Orders

  • Eviction of the Defendant from the subject land
  • Kshs. 200,000 in general damages
  • Costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Eviction of the Defendant
  • General damages of Kshs. 200,000

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (1)
  • Halsbury Laws of England 4th Edition, Vol. 45 at para 26, 1503
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case