SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Peter Onsongo Ogeto v Shem Osiago Morumbwa & another [2019] KEELC 3087 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3087 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3087
Citation
[2019] KEELC 3087 (KLR)
Decided
30 May 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a previous ruling denying an injunction
Holding

The application is not res judicata and the court finds that the applicant is entitled to security pending hearing and determination of the suit.

Facts

The plaintiff seeks an order that in the event the 2nd defendant exercises its statutory power of sale, the surplus from the sale of the suit property be deposited in court as security pending hearing and determination of the suit. The plaintiff also seeks that in the event the 1st defendant services his outstanding loan with the 2nd defendant, title documents in respect of the suit property be deposited in court as security pending hearing and determination of the suit.

Issues

  1. Whether the application is res judicata
  2. Whether the applicant is entitled to security pending hearing and determination of the suit

Reasoning

The court finds that the previous ruling did not address the issue of security pending hearing and determination of the suit. The court then considers the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Act and rules that the applicant is entitled to security under Order 39 Rule 1 or Order 39 Rule 5.

Outcome

The application is granted

Orders

  • The surplus from the sale of the suit property be deposited in court as security pending hearing and determination of the suit
  • Title documents in respect of the suit property be deposited in court as security pending hearing and determination of the suit

Remedies

  • Security pending hearing and determination of the suit

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Order 39 Rule 1
  • Order 39 Rule 5
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case