SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Raphael Kariuki Wamae & another v Nancy Wanyoike & 3 others [2019] KEELC 3311 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3311 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3311
Citation
[2019] KEELC 3311 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial judgmentCoramB M EBOSO
Holding

The court found in favor of the plaintiffs on all claims and awarded special damages for hiring an excavator and low-loader, deposit for fencing, and costs. The court did not award general damages.

Facts

The plaintiffs, the registered proprietors of a land, brought a suit against the defendants for trespassing and erecting a perimeter wall around the land. The plaintiffs claimed special damages for hiring an excavator and low-loader to remove the wall, and for depositing money to put up a live wire fence. They also sought a permanent injunction against the defendants' trespassing and encroachment on their land.

Issues

  1. Trespassing and encroachment on the plaintiffs' land
  2. Special damages for hiring excavator and low-loader
  3. Special damages for depositing money for fencing
  4. Permanent injunction against trespassing and encroachment

Reasoning

The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs due to the plaintiffs' proof of trespassing and encroachment, and awarded special damages for hiring an excavator and low-loader and deposit for fencing.

Outcome

In favor of the plaintiffs

Orders

  • Special damages for hiring an excavator and low-loader
  • Special damages for depositing money for fencing
  • Permanent injunction against trespassing and encroachment
  • Costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Special damages for hiring an excavator and low-loader
  • Special damages for depositing money for fencing
  • Permanent injunction against trespassing and encroachment
  • Costs of the suit
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case