SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nthumbi Muchungu & 12 others v Herbert Nthiiri & 16 others [2019] KEELC 3351 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3351 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3351
Citation
[2019] KEELC 3351 (KLR)
Decided
16 May 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeCivilPostureInterlocutory application for injunction and inhibitionCoramY.M. ANGIMA
The court finds merit in the Plaintiffs' application for an order of inhibition against the Defendants in this suit only.

Facts

The Plaintiffs sought an injunction and order to inhibit the Defendants from dealing with various sub-divisions of parcel 172 pending an intended appeal to the Court of Appeal. The Plaintiffs were the successful parties in a previous judgment against parcel 172.

Issues

  • Preservation of subject matter of litigation
  • Scope of injunction

Reasoning

The court considers the Plaintiffs' application on merit, noting the Plaintiffs' apprehension that the Defendants may dispose of the sub-divisions before the appeal is heard. The court finds it necessary to preserve the subject matter of litigation, but declines to make orders affecting current registered proprietors who are not parties to the suit.

Outcome

The court makes an order of inhibition against 12 sub-divisions of parcel 172 and declines the prayer for an interim injunction.

Orders

  • Order of inhibition against 12 sub-divisions of parcel 172
  • Decline of prayer for interim injunction

Remedies

  • Costs of the application to the Plaintiffs

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap. 21)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (1)
  • Shivabhai Patel Vs Manibhai Patel [1959] EA 907
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case