SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Regina Mwikali Muema v Beth Wanjiru & another [2019] KEELC 343 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 343 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
343
Citation
[2019] KEELC 343 (KLR)
Decided
7 November 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramE.O.OBAGA
Holding

The court finds that the Defendant is entitled to a permanent injunction to protect her from the Plaintiff's insults and interference. The Plaintiff's prayers for a permanent injunction, order of eviction, and damages are dismissed.

Facts

The Plaintiff claims to own Plot No.177/1 Ngei 2A Huruma, Nairobi, which is adjacent to the Defendant's Plot No.177 EEC Ngei II. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant has encroached on her plot and harassed her. The Defendant claims that the Plaintiff has been harassing her and has made complaints against her.

Issues

  1. Whether Plot No. 177/1 exists on the ground.
  2. Whether the Defendant has encroached on to the said plot.
  3. Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to the prayers sought.
  4. Whether the 1st Defendant is entitled to the prayers sought.

Reasoning

The court determines that the Plaintiff cannot prove that the Defendant has encroached on her land. The Plaintiff's balcony is not considered an encroachment as it is over an open space. The court grants the Defendant's prayer for an injunction but not as an eviction order.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • A permanent injunction to the 1st Defendant to protect her from the Plaintiff's insults and interference.
  • The Plaintiff's prayers for a permanent injunction, order of eviction, and damages are dismissed.

Remedies

  • Permanent injunction for the 1st Defendant to protect her from the Plaintiff's insults and interference.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case