SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Rose Wangui Kivunye v Samuel Mwangi Ngugi [2019] KEELC 3568 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3568 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3568
Citation
[2019] KEELC 3568 (KLR)
Decided
30 April 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand Dispute AppealPostureAppeal from Provincial Land Appeals Committee Award to Environment and Land CourtCoramS. Okongo
The court dismissed the appeal and ordered Kivunye to vacate and hand over possession of the land to Ngugi within 120 days.

Facts

In March 2007, Samuel Mwangi Ngugi claimed that Rose Wangui Kivunye was illegally occupying his land, Escarpment/Kinale Block 1/1761, and sought eviction. The Kiambu District Land Disputes Tribunal awarded Ngugi possession of the land on May 11, 2007. Ngugi appealed to the Provincial Land Appeals Committee, which upheld the tribunal's decision. Kivunye appealed to the Environment and Land Court.

Issues

  • Whether Kivunye was in illegal occupation of the suit property and as such a trespasser.
  • Whether Kivunye as an illegal occupant of the suit property should be evicted therefrom.

Reasoning

The court found no merit in the appeal, noting that the appeals committee did not determine the validity of the appellant's husband's title and that the committee's decision was based on the evidence before it.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Kivunye to vacate and hand over possession of L.R. No. Escarpment/Kinale Block 1/1761 to Ngugi within 120 days from the date of the judgment.
  • Failure to vacate within the time limit warrants issuance of warrants of eviction for her forceful eviction from the property.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case