Rose Muthoni Sarago v County Secretary Kajiado County Government & another [2019] KEELC 3990 (KLR)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 3990
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 3990 (KLR)
- Decided
- 25 March 2019
Summary at a glance
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramCHRISTINE OCHIENG
The Court determined that plot 579 is not plot 1014, as confirmed by the Part Development Plan and the site visit conducted by the Deputy Registrar.
Facts
The Plaintiff claimed that the Defendant had encroached on her plot and was trying to take it over, while the Defendant claimed that the Plaintiff's plot was actually plot 1014, which belonged to her.
Issues
- Location of plot numbers 579 and 1014
- Costs of the suit
Reasoning
The Court found that the Plaintiff's plot is the 6th in the row, as per the evidence and the Part Development Plan, while the Defendant's plot 1014 is the 6th in the row as per the evidence and the site visit.
Outcome
The Plaintiff's claims were dismissed.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…