SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Malindi Kadhi; Mahendan & 3 others (Exparte Applicants); Salim (Interested Party) (Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application 14 of 2017) [2019] KEELC 5105 (KLR) (31 January 2019) (Judgment)

[2019] KEELC 5105 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
5105
Citation
[2019] KEELC 5105 (KLR)
Decided
31 January 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte application for leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibitionCoramJO OLOLA
The Court dismisses the application and orders the injunctions to remain with the Kadhi Malindi.

Facts

The Ex-parte Applicants (Nuru Omar Mahendan, Mariam Omar Mahendan, Anzun Omar Mahendan, Malikia Omar Mahendan, and Fatma Sharif Salim) seek to remove injunctions issued by Malindi Kadhi on 25th July 2017, and Fatma Sharif Salim is an Interested Party.

Issues

  • Kadhi Malindi's jurisdiction to deal with land issues and issue injunctions
  • threshold for grant of judicial review orders

Reasoning

The Court finds that the Kadhi Malindi acted within his jurisdiction and that the application does not meet the threshold for grant of judicial review orders.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The injunctions issued by the Kadhi Malindi remain with the Kadhi Malindi
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case