SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Cabinet Secretary for Petroleum & Mining & 2 others Ex parte Dennis Ruto Kapchok (Suing on his Behalf and on behalf of the Citizens of Tamkal, Kiwawa, Alale, Ortum Sebit, Pusel and Chepchoi, Iyon Iyang River, Marich and Endough in West Pokot County; County Governmetn of West Pokot & another (Interested Parties) [2019] KEELC 680 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 680 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
680
Citation
[2019] KEELC 680 (KLR)
Decided
21 November 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPosturePreliminary Objection to Amended Chamber Summons ApplicationCoramJustice, Visram
Holding

The court dismissed the preliminary objection, finding that the court does have jurisdiction to hear the matter and that the proceedings are not defective.

Facts

The Republic of Kenya is seeking judicial review of the decisions made by the Cabinet Secretary for Petroleum & Mining regarding mining licenses granted to Cemtech Limited.

Issues

  1. Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the matter
  2. Whether the proceedings are defective for want of compliance with the law
  3. What orders should issue

Reasoning

The court ruled that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the application and that the application is not fatally defective.

Outcome

The preliminary objection was dismissed.

Orders

  • The preliminary objection was dismissed.
  • The orders sought in the Amended Chamber Summons Application will be granted.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Fair Administrative Actions Act, No. 4 of 2015
  • Mining Act, No. 12 of 2016
Cases cited (1)
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel Lillian 'S' vs Caltex Kenya Ltd 1989 KLR 1
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case