Boaz Kipchumba Kaino v G.H. Tanna & Sons Ltd ; Abdu Mukhwana & 3 others (Interested Parties) [2019] KEELC 756 (KLR)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 756
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 756 (KLR)
- Decided
- 14 November 2019
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for injunction and other incidental reliefCoramMWANGI NJOROGE
Holding
The application is denied and struck out with costs.
Facts
The applicants are interested parties in a previous land case. They claim that the proposed plaintiffs (Mukwana, Sambula, Wesele, Makona) have letters of allotment for parcels in dispute and that they were not aware of the previous judgment until 2018.
Issues
- Should the applicants be enjoined in the suit in which judgment has already been rendered?
- What orders should issue?
Reasoning
The court finds the application devoid of merit and declines to grant the injunction.
Outcome
Application denied and struck out with costs.
Orders
- Application denied
- Application struck out with costs
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…