SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Rhino Valley Lodge Limited v Kenya Wildlife Services [2020] KEELC 1471 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 1471 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1471
Citation
[2020] KEELC 1471 (KLR)
Decided
29 July 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeArbitrationPostureApplication for conservatory orders of protection against eviction pending arbitrationCoramC.K. YANO
Holding

Allow the application for interim protection on terms

Facts

The applicant, Rhino Valley Lodge Limited, is a tenant of the respondent, Kenya Wildlife Services, under a lease dated 30th September, 2015. The respondent has given notice to terminate the lease and has threatened to take over possession of the suit premises. The applicant is in arrears of rent, attributing it to tribal clashes, post-election violence, and terrorist attacks.

Issues

  1. Locus standi of the applicant
  2. Whether the subject matter of arbitration is under threat
  3. Appropriate measure of protection after an assessment of the merits of the application

Reasoning

The existence of an arbitration agreement and the threat to the subject matter of arbitration. The court orders interim protection on terms and allows mediation and arbitration if not complied with.

Outcome

Application granted

Orders

  • Deposit rental dues in a joint interest earning account
  • Mediation and arbitration within 60 days
  • Failure to comply with terms results in lapse of orders

Remedies

  • Interim protection on terms
  • Deposit rental dues
  • Mediation and arbitration

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Arbitration Act, 1995
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Constitution of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case