SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Chita Ngolo Chita v District Land Registrar-Kilifi & 2 others; Indravadan Ashibhai Patel & another (Interested Parties) [2020] KEELC 2 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 2 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2
Citation
[2020] KEELC 2 (KLR)
Decided
2 October 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetition for Declaration and Mandatory OrderPostureAppeal from the High Court at MombasaCoramBILLY M. MUITA
Holding

The Court declared the Respondents' actions unlawful and in contravention of the Petitioner's rights under the Constitution, and ordered the Respondents to rectify and fix the boundaries of the Petitioner's land.

Facts

The Petitioner, Chita Ngolo Chita, is the owner and occupier of land adjacent to Plot No. 218, which was created in his name in 1984. The Respondents, District Land Registrar-Kilifi and others, allegedly withheld access to the original adjudication records and other land registry records, preventing the Petitioner from effectively responding to a suit filed against him.

Issues

  1. Denial of access to original adjudication records and land registry records
  2. Rectification and fixing of boundaries of the Petitioner's land
  3. Protection of the Petitioner's fundamental rights under the Constitution

Reasoning

The Court found that the Respondents' actions violated the Petitioner's rights to access to public information and protection from deprivation of property, and ordered the Respondents to rectify the boundaries of the Petitioner's land.

Outcome

The Petitioner's appeal was successful.

Orders

  • By consent, the Provincial Surveyor Coast and the District Registrar Kilifi ascertain and fix boundaries of Plot No. Buni/Kisimani/218 measuring approximately 4.01 Ha (9.90871 acres) as per the title Deed issued on the 1st October, 2009

Remedies

  • Rectification of the boundaries of the Petitioner's land
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case