SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mercy Njeri Nyaga & another v Erastus Njue Gitanguthi & 2 others [2020] KEELC 2014 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 2014 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2014
Citation
[2020] KEELC 2014 (KLR)
Decided
20 February 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a judgment of the Environment and Land CourtCoramMajanja, Tunoi
Holding

The court found no evidence to support the Plaintiffs' allegations of fraud and dismissed their claim.

Facts

The Plaintiffs, as legal representatives of the estate of their deceased father, sued the Defendants for declaring the transfer and registration of land parcels as fraudulent and for costs. The Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendants secretly transferred the land without their knowledge and consent, and that the deceased was mentally unsound at the time of the alleged sale.

Issues

  1. Whether the land transfers were fraudulent
  2. Whether due process was followed in the transfer
  3. Whether the Plaintiffs' suit is time barred
  4. Who shall bear the costs of the suit

Reasoning

The court held that the Plaintiffs' allegations of fraud were not sufficiently pleaded and supported by evidence. The standard of proof for fraud is higher than on a balance of probabilities, and the Plaintiffs' evidence was inconsistent with their pleadings.

Outcome

Dismissed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Vijay Morjaria v Nansing M. Darbar & Another [2000] eKLR
  • Evans Otieno Nyakwana v Cleophas Bwana Ongaro [2015] eKLR
  • Central Bank of Kenya Ltd v Trust Bank Ltd and 4 Others Nai Civil Appeal No. 215 of 1996 (UR)
  • Galaxy Paints Co. Ltd v Falcon Guards Ltd [2000] 2 EA 358
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case