SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Clement Muturi Kigano v County Government of Mombasa & 2 others [2020] KEELC 2128 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 2128 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2128
Citation
[2020] KEELC 2128 (KLR)
Decided
9 June 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from the High Court at MombasaCoramA. OMOLLO
Holding

The Plaintiff's application is dismissed with costs, as he failed to demonstrate a genuine and arguable case.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Clement Muturi Kigano, claimed ownership of land in Mikindani Site and Service Scheme, which he alleged was originally allocated to Mwakandi Ngao Mwakandi in 1987. Mwakandi sold the property to Kigano, who secured it with barbed wire and cedar posts. In 2015, Kigano discovered temporary structures on the land and learned that the 2nd Defendant, Grace Wangui Mahuthu, was the registered owner. Kigano filed a judicial review application at the High Court, which was dismissed.

Issues

  1. Ownership of the land
  2. Injunctions to restrain Defendants from interfering with the land

Reasoning

The Court found that the Plaintiff did not have a prima facie case and that the Plaintiff's delay in instituting the case was unconscionable. The Plaintiff also failed to show irreparable harm.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case