SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Ocunty Government of Kisumu Ex Parte; Transmattress Limited [2020] KEELC 2828 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 2828 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2828
Citation
[2020] KEELC 2828 (KLR)
Decided
28 April 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Certiorari and ProhibitionCoramA.O. OMBWAYO
Holding

The court quashed the respondent's notice and prohibited the respondent from carrying out the threat to demolish the applicant's building structures and premises.

Facts

Trans-mattresses Ltd applied for judicial review against the County Government of Kisumu regarding a notice to demolish their building structures on the suit property. The applicant claimed to be the registered proprietor of the land, having acquired it legally, taken possession, developed, and paid land rates and rents. The respondent demolished a wall surrounding the suit land, claiming it was on an access road, and the applicant disputed this.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent's notice to demolish the applicant's building structures is valid
  2. Whether the respondent can carry out the threat to demolish the applicant's premises

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant is the registered proprietor of the suit property and that the respondent's demolition of the wall was not on an access road, thus the notice was invalid.

Outcome

Judgment in favor of the applicant

Orders

  • Quashing the respondent's notice to demolish the applicant's building structures
  • Prohibiting the respondent from carrying out the threat to demolish the applicant's premises

Remedies

  • Quashing the notice and prohibiting the respondent from demolishing the applicant's structures

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Fair Administrative Action Act 2015
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case