SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Michael Munene Kuburia &another; v Virginiah Muthoni Gachubi &another; [2020] KEELC 3246 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 3246 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3246
Citation
[2020] KEELC 3246 (KLR)
Decided
14 February 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for stay of execution pending appealCoramE.C. CHERONO
Holding

Application for stay pending appeal is dismissed. Plaintiffs have not shown substantial loss that would render the appeal nugatory.

Facts

The plaintiffs are seeking a stay of the judgment and decree issued on 28 June 2019, which ordered them to vacate L.R. No. INOI/KIAGA/63 within six months. They claim the judgment is flawed and they have filed an appeal. The defendants argue that the plaintiffs have not established trust in the land.

Issues

  1. Substantial loss to plaintiffs if stay is not granted
  2. Whether plaintiffs' continued stay in the land after a finding of unlawful stay justifies a stay pending appeal

Reasoning

The court considers the applicants' continued stay in the respondents' land after a finding of unlawful stay as not a ground for stay pending appeal. The court does not find that the applicants have satisfied the court that they will suffer substantial loss unless the order of stay is granted.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for stay pending appeal is dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Order 42 Rule 6
Cases cited (3)
  • Butt Vs Rent Restriction Tribunal (1982) K.L.R 417
  • James Wangalina & Another Vs Agnes Wathiaka Cheseto (2012) e K.L.R
  • Silverstein Vs Chesoni (2002) 1 K.L.R 867
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case