SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Elijah Mburu Wanyoike v Regina Wanjiru Nganga & another [2020] KEELC 3306 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 3306 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3306
Citation
[2020] KEELC 3306 (KLR)
Decided
3 March 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand SuitPostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramL. GACHERU
Holding

The Plaintiff's suit is dismissed with no orders as to costs, but the Defendants' counterclaim is allowed in terms of prayers (a) and (b) only with no orders as to costs.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Elijah Mburu Wanyoike, claimed ownership of two land parcels (Gatamaiyu/Nyanduma 3330 and 3331) based on a sale agreement with Samuel Ndungu Nganga. The Defendants, Regina Wanjiru Nganga and Josephine Wanjiru Ndungu, contested the claim and sought to have the Plaintiff's suit dismissed with costs.

Issues

  1. Ownership of land parcels Gatamaiyu/Nyanduma 3330 and 3331
  2. Validity of the sale agreement

Reasoning

The Court found that the Plaintiff failed to prove his case on the required standard of balance of probability, while the Defendants partially proved their case.

Outcome

The Plaintiff's suit is dismissed with no orders as to costs, and the Defendants' counterclaim is allowed in terms of prayers (a) and (b) only with no orders as to costs.

Orders

  • The initial subdivisions of LR.No.Gatamaiyu/Nyanduma/654 are cancelled and revoked
  • The Defendants are each entitled to 0.87 acres from the initial parcel of land

Remedies

  • The Plaintiff should obtain the equivalent of what he purchased from the late Samuel Ndungu Nganga from his estate

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Land Registration Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case