SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Paul Kibet Kiplagat & another v Dennis Ashton Nyangiri & another [2020] KEELC 3679 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 3679 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3679
Citation
[2020] KEELC 3679 (KLR)
Decided
13 February 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from an original trialCoramJ. M. MUTUNGI
Holding

The court directs the joinder of the owner of land parcel Njoro/Ngata Block 2/3924 as an interested party in the proceedings and orders the plaintiffs to amend the plaint to include this party within 30 days of the ruling.

Facts

The plaintiffs claim that the 1st defendant had interfered with the boundaries of their land parcels, leading to encroachment. The 2nd defendant was the land surveyor who subdivided the plaintiffs' original land parcel.

Issues

  1. Trespass on land parcel No. Njoro/Ngata Block 2/3922
  2. Invalidity of resurvey and marking of new boundaries on plaintiffs' parcel No. 3922
  3. General damages

Reasoning

The court found that the owner of land parcel Njoro/Ngata Block 2/3924 was a necessary party as his actions could have led to the chain of events that resulted in the suit.

Outcome

The plaintiffs are ordered to amend the plaint to include the owner of land parcel Njoro/Ngata Block 2/3924 as an interested party within 30 days of the ruling.

Orders

  • Joinder of the owner of land parcel Njoro/Ngata Block 2/3924 as an interested party
  • Amendment of the plaint to include the owner of land parcel Njoro/Ngata Block 2/3924 as an interested party within 30 days of the ruling
  • Service of the interested party with the pleadings and liberty to file their pleadings within 21 days of service

Remedies

  • Amendment of the plaint to include the owner of land parcel Njoro/Ngata Block 2/3924 as an interested party
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case